Bitcoin

Infeasible Costs Make 51% Attacks on Bitcoin and Ethereum Networks Impossible: Coin Metrics

Why 51% Attacks on Bitcoin and Ethereum are No Longer Viable

It is no longer viable for nation-states to destroy the Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) networks through 51% attacks. According to the latest research from crypto intelligence firm Coin Metrics, the astronomical costs required to carry out such attacks make them impractical and unprofitable. A 51% attack refers to a malicious actor owning more than 51% of the mining hash rate in a proof-of-work system like Bitcoin or 51% of staked crypto in a proof-of-stake network like Ethereum. This level of control theoretically enables attackers to manipulate the blockchain and undermine its integrity.

Cost Analysis and Feasibility

In the report, Coin Metrics researchers argued that the current cost of capital and operational expenses associated with achieving 51% control make continuous attacks by nation-state actors unfeasible. They introduced a metric called “Total Cost to Attack” (TCA) to quantify the cost of attacking a blockchain network. Using this metric, the report concluded that there are no profitable avenues for attacking either the Bitcoin or Ethereum networks, rendering the financial incentive for nefarious attackers obsolete.

Bitcoin Attack Feasibility

The report highlighted that even in the most profitable double spend scenario considered, where an attacker could potentially make $1 billion after spending $40 billion, the rate of return would only be 2.5%. Analyzing secondary market data and real-time hash rate output, the researchers found that a 51% attack on Bitcoin would require the purchase of approximately 7 million ASIC mining rigs, totaling around $20 billion.

However, there simply aren’t enough ASIC rigs available on the market to execute such an attack. Even if a nation-state attacker were resourceful enough to manufacture their own mining rigs, the report estimated the cost to be north of $20 billion, making it financially unviable.

Ethereum’s 34% Attack Exaggerated

The report also addressed concerns about a potential 34% staking attack on the Ethereum network by Lido validators. Coin Metrics concluded that leveraging Liquid Staking Derivatives (LSDs) to attack the Ethereum blockchain would not only be time-consuming but also extremely expensive. The researchers estimated that an attack on Ethereum would take six months due to the churn limit preventing stake from being deployed all at once, with a cost exceeding $34 billion. The attacker would need to manage over 200 nodes and spend $1 million on Amazon Web Services (AWS) alone.

Expert Opinion

Experts, including Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter, praised Coin Metrics’ research as a significant contribution to the field. Carter highlighted that previous analyses had been vague or theory-driven, whereas this report provided a rigorous and empirical analysis of the impracticality of 51% attacks on Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Masha Media News.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • LegitimaciĂłn:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actĂşa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • InformaciĂłn Adicional: Puede consultar la informaciĂłn detallada en la PolĂ­tica de Privacidad.

You May Also Like

DeFi

📰 Table Of Contents1 Layer N Welcomes Luc Froehlich to Advisory Board1.1 Protocol’s Innovative Approach2 Layer N Unveils Nord Roll-up Testnet2.1 Nord Roll-up Features3...

Bitcoin

📰 Table Of Contents1 Argentinian Regulators and El Salvador Discuss Bitcoin Adoption1.1 Exploring Possible Cooperation Agreements1.2 Learning from El Salvador’s Bitcoin Experience1.3 Strengthening Ties...

Blockchain

đź“° Table Of Contents1 Ledger Stax Hardware Wallet Shipping Update2 Design Challenges and Delay2.1 Enhanced User Experience3 Ledger Stax Pricing and Security Features3.1 Production...

Bitcoin

📰 Table Of Contents1 Biden’s Decision on SEC’s Crypto Regulations Nears1.1 Overview of the Situation1.2 Potential Outcomes of Presidential Action1.3 Implications for Bitcoin and...

DeFi

📰 Table Of Contents1 Pseudonymous Developer Confesses to Stealing Funds from Cypher Protocol1.1 Hoak’s Confession and Fund Theft1.2 Transfer of Funds to Binance1.3 Impact...

Blockchain

đź“° Table Of Contents1 Binance France Ownership Restructuring1.1 Reasons for Ownership Change1.2 New Shareholders1.3 Yulong Yan1.4 Lihua He1.5 Global Restructuring Project1.6 Regulatory Challenges and...

Ethereum

📰 Table Of Contents1 Fake Crypto Airdrops Targeting Investors1.1 Crypto Scam Victim’s Experience1.2 Airdrop Scams and Their Tactics1.3 Preventative Measures for Investors1.4 Importance of...

Blockchain

đź“° Table Of Contents1 Interview with Jon Trask, CEO of Dimitra: Revolutionizing Agriculture with Blockchain and AI1.1 Revolutionizing Agriculture Across Africa and the Globe1.2...

Copyright © 2024 CRYPTOWIRE.TOP. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content, emphasizing that investing involves risks. Ensure you conduct thorough research before investing and be ready for any potential losses. For those over 18 and interested in gambling: Online gambling laws differ across countries; adhere to your local regulations. By using this site, you agree to our terms, including the presence of affiliate links that do not impact our evaluations. Cryptocurrency offers on this site are not in line with UK financial promotion regulations and are not aimed at UK consumers.

Exit mobile version